por Robin Lasky
, Contributing Reporter | July 02, 2021
Medical experts, regulators, industry, and deficit hawks continue to clash over the FDA’s decision to grant accelerated approval to Biogen Inc.’s Alzheimer's treatment Aduhelm (aducanumab), prompting renewed interest in this class of drugs.
For nearly two decades, those affected by Alzheimer’s have been frustrated by a dearth of new treatment options. Until now, available treatments have exclusively offered symptom relief as opposed to options for slowing, stopping, or reversing the progression of the disease.
The FDA’s decision early last month to grant accelerated approval of Aduhelm has spurred new hope
for the 6.2 million Americans living with Alzheimer’s dementia, and their loved ones.
Numed, a well established company in business since 1975 provides a wide range of service options including time & material service, PM only contracts, full service contracts, labor only contracts & system relocation. Call 800 96 Numed for more info.
"The Alzheimer's Association believes that approval ushers a new era in Alzheimer's treatment and even in research," said Maria Carrillo, chief scientific officer for the Alzheimer's Association in a statement. "For people living with Alzheimer's, this treatment means a potential to delay decline."
The decision also appears to have prompted Eli Lilly to announce that it will be seeking approval following a trial involving 272 patients with Alzheimer's for its similarly acting drug donanemab, which has been given “breakthrough” status by the FDA.
But critics have accused the FDA and proponents of this drug of promoting false hope in a treatment that presents significant medical risks but small to no clinical benefits.
The FDA’s decision went against the recommendation of its expert advisory panel that was convened to weigh in on the merits of the drug’s approval. Out of the ten experts who served on the panel, eight voted against approval and two were undecided.
Aaron Kesselheim, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, has served on the FDA’s expert advisory panel since 2015, and is one of three of the panel’s members who have resigned in the aftermath of this decision.
“It is clear to me that FDA is not presently capable of adequately integrating the committee’s scientific recommendations into its approval decisions,” he wrote in his resignation to acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, calling it “probably the worst drug approval decision in recent U.S. history”.
This class of drugs is intended to work by reducing clumps of a protein called amyloid plaque that has been found to develop in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s, under the theory that a reduction in amyloid plaque will stall or slow progression of cognitive decline.