Radiologist hit with $11.5 million malpractice verdict

Huge Two-Day Clean Sweep Auction July 24-25th. Click Here to Bid!

Ubicación actual:
> This Story

Conexión o Registro to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment




U.S. Healthcare Homepage

CMS proposes alternative payment model for radiation oncology Uses prospective, episode-based payments; ensures value-based care

Siemens forms $113 million alliance with UM System and MU Health Care The 10-year partnership will focus on improved care delivery and research

Misdiagnosis behind a third of malpractice cases Researchers from Johns Hopkins look at 55,000 malpractice claims

Rising workloads and technology are main causes of clinician burnout Called a 'public health crisis' by 92 percent of survey respondents

Providers in need of more specialists, fewer primary care physicians, says report Facing projected shortage in a number of specialties

Claims data will power new research initiative developing predictive models to fight opioid crisis Understanding risk factors and addressing them

Consumer experience is top priority for 69 percent of US hospitals: survey Trend reflects growing patient burden in paying for services

SIIM spotlights gender parity challenges in imaging informatics Leveling the playing field and fighting Imposter Syndrome

Hahnemann hospital ownership files for bankruptcy protection 'Safety net' hospital faces closure that could highly impact lower income patients

Admittance for radiology residencies based on looks, says study Discriminates against obese or unattractive candidates

Radiologist hit with $11.5 million malpractice verdict

por Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
A Newton-Wellesley Hospital radiologist has been ordered to pay $11.5 million after being found negligent by a jury over a missed enlarged heart diagnosis a decade ago.

Eighteen-month-old Anna Coelho went into cardiac arrest in April 2009 and incurred severe brain damage, the result of "a significant delay in the diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis.” Radiologist Dr. William Denison, who performed a chest X-ray on the child before the event, found that “bronchiolitis v. atypical pneumonia was likely present,”, according to the Boston Globe.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material,camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED

“She would have undergone an echocardiogram, her myocarditis would have been diagnosed and treated, and more likely than not, Anna would not have suffered heart failure and cardiac arrest which resulted in her severe and permanent neurological injury,” noted her lawyers.

Following two days of deliberations, the jury in the Middlesex Superior Court found Denison to be “a substantial contributing factor in causing injury” to the patient. ED physician Dr. Ilhan Schwartz was not found negligent.

The ruling came despite protestations by defendants that they “complied with the standard of care with respect to all of the treatment and care they provided to Anna Coelho,” and that, “Anna did not present with any signs or symptoms that would raise a suspicion of viral myocarditis, and she was appropriately transferred to Massachusetts General Hospital when her condition suddenly deteriorated,” according to a pretrial memorandum.

Coehlo's attorney William Thompson disagrees, saying the care she received has left the now 11-year-old functioning “in some ways as a 4-year-old in terms of her development."

"We’re very happy that the jury recognized that the harm to Anna Coelho was preventable and the seriousness of that X-ray should not have been dismissed,” he told the Globe.

While the Newton-Wellesley hospital was not a defendant, its spokesman said in a statement, that the institution “extends heartfelt sympathies to the Coelho family and we are pleased that this difficult matter has been resolved,” adding that, “we remain confident that the caregivers at Newton-Wellesley Hospital provided high-quality and appropriate care.”

U.S. Healthcare Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment