DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Ubicación actual:
> This Story

Conexión o Registro to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment



MRI Homepage

MR could predict survival and treatment response for patients with brain metastasis May spare them life-threatening surgeries

New nanoparticle technology may replace MR for cancer detection Shows promise in preclinical study

Study finds bi-annual MR exams better option for young women with genetic risk Annual mammogram may not be necessary

Researchers develop MR technique to predict and prevent pregnancy complications Tracking water molecules to assess placenta health

Community practices not abiding by breast cancer screening guidelines for MR High breast density isn't enough

Mayo Clinic expert emphasizes safety demands of interventional MR procedures Ideal solution is a dedicated iMR site

Top 10 trends and takeaways from RSNA 2017 Are radiologists going the way of the dodo bird? Of course not / Yes, yes they are

Expert makes the case for patient access to radiology reports Patients want a more active role in their care

Sectra announces MR and ultrasound monitoring capabilities for DoseTrack Will no longer be limited to information from ionizing sources

GE debuts new flexible, blanket-like MR coils at RSNA Improves patient comfort during whole body exams

Doctors consider and discuss options
regarding an MR image of the brain

Contrasting viewpoints on gadolinium

por Gus Iversen , Editor in Chief
From the October 2017 issue of DOTmed HealthCare Business News magazine

Gadolinium contrast agents are used in 40 to 50 percent of MR scans and, by some estimates, roughly 400 million doses have been administered since it was introduced in 1988.

For most of those years, the agent appeared to have virtually no drawbacks, but over the last decade or so, the medical imaging community has been forced to reexamine that narrative.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

CT, MRI, NM, SPECT/CT, PET & PET/CT service, refurbished systems and parts

Accelerate your ROI with our Black Diamond Certified refurbished systems. One year warranty - ISO 13485 Certified - FDA registered - Over 65k parts in inventory

In 2006, researchers discovered that the agent put patients with renal insufficiencies at risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Then, in 2013, findings surfaced suggesting that gadolinium could accumulate in the brain of patients undergoing multiple scans.

Since then, the question that remains unanswered has been: what are the clinical implications for gadolinium accumulation in the brain?

Assessing risks
In March, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) concluded an assessment of gadolinium agents and recommended regulatory actions, including suspension for some marketing authorizations.

Two months later, the FDA weighed in on gadolinium with its own findings. The agency announced that, after a two-year study of the issue, it had not identified adverse health effects from gadolinium retained in the brain after the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for MR imaging.

“Our recommendations for health care professionals and patients remain unchanged from July 2015, when we informed the public that we were investigating this potential risk with GBCAs,” the agency wrote in a statement. “Because we identified no evidence to date that gadolinium retention in the brain from any of the GBCAs, including GBCAs associated with higher retention of gadolinium, is harmful, restricting GBCA use is not warranted at this time.”

Despite those findings, an FDA panel voted in September to add retention warnings to the labeling of gadolinium agents. The group also voted unanimously (15-0) in favor of requiring contrast manufacturers to conduct more studies aimed at understanding the implications of gadolinium retention and any health risks that may accompany it.

Macrocyclic versus linear gadolinium contrast agents
Gadolinium retention rates appear to be lower with macrocyclic agents – such as Dotarem (Guerbet), Gadavist (Bayer) and ProHance (Bracco) – than with linear agents. For that reason, the PRAC recommendations refer to linear agents – such as MultiHance (Bracco), Omniscan (GE Healthcare), Magnevist (Bayer) and Optimark (Guerbet).

Still, in some cases, the PRAC recommended keeping particular linear agents available. For example, it determined that gadoxetic acid (a linear agent marketed by Bayer as Primovist in Europe and Eovist in the U.S.) should remain on the market because it meets an important diagnostic need in patients with few alternatives.
  Pages: 1 - 2 - 3 >>

MRI Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Aumente su conciencia de marca
Subastas + ventas Privadas
Consigue el mejor precio
Comprar Equipo/Piezas
Encuentra El Precio Más Bajo
Noticias diarias
Lee las últimas noticias
Examina todos los usuarios DOTmed
Ética en DOTmed
Ver nuestro programa de ética
El oro parte programa del vendedor
Recibir las solicitudes de PH
Programa de distribuidor con servicio gold
Recibe solicitudes
Proveedores de atención de salud
Ver todos los HCP (abreviatura de asistencia médica) Herramientas
Encontrar/rellenar un trabajo
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Obtener presupuestos para piezas
Certificado recientemente
Ver usuarios certificados recientemente
Recientemente clasificado
Ver usuarios certificados recientemente
Central de alquiler
Alquila equipos por menos
Vende equipos/piezas
Obtén más dinero
Mantenga el foro de los técnicos
Buscar ayuda y asesoramiento
Petición sencilla de propuestas
Obtén presupuestos para equipos
Feria comercial virtual
Encuentra servicio para el equipo
El acceso y el uso de este sitio está conforme a los términos y a las condiciones de nuestro AVISO LEGAL & AVISO DE LA AISLAMIENTO
Característica de y propietario DOTmeda .com, inc. Copyright ©2001-2017, Inc.