U. of Missouri-Columbia to pay $2.2 million over radiology false claims violations
advertisement
Ubicación actual:
>
> This Story


Conexión o Registro to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

U.S. Healthcare Homepage

Preparing for the coming increase in stroke and physical therapy patients As baby boomers enter their 60s patient volume will increase

ONC takes aim at data sharing and interoperability The 21st Century Cures Act is about more than just medical research

Half of US hospital leaders surveyed are unfamiliar with premise of AI Less than a quarter are currently seeking to implement it

Law to reduce unneeded Medicare CT, MR exams delayed by Trump administration Overuse penalties stalled until 2022 or 2023: Kaiser Health News

RSNA and ACR to establish clinical data registry for 3D printing Demonstrating clinical value of 3D printing and best use of the technology

MD Anderson to expand proton therapy center with $159 million project Increases accessibility to higher number of patients

NY law requires coverage for medically necessary mammo for women under 40 More than 12,000 younger women diagnosed with breast cancer annually

Siemens diagnostics president to step down, new board member appointed CEO Bernd Montag will assume responsibility of the business unit

US Court of Appeals rejects Hologic petition to revisit patent invalidation Regards case against Minerva Surgical's Endometrial Ablation System

Hospital M&A revenue rose to $11.3 billion in Q2 this year Atrium Health acquiring Wake Forest Baptist Health was most notable

via Wikimedia Commons

U. of Missouri-Columbia to pay $2.2 million over radiology false claims violations

por Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
University of Missouri-Columbia has agreed to pay $2.2 million to settle alleged false claims act violations concerning the work of a pair of radiologists.

At issue was the submission of claims for radiology services to federal programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE, according to the U.S. Attorney's office for the Western District of Missouri.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE, Philips and Siemens CT equipment with OEM trained engineers

Numed, a well established company in business since 1975 provides a wide range of service options including time & material service, PM only contracts, full service contracts, labor only contracts & system relocation. Call 800 96 Numed for more info.



Medicare pays claims for resident physicians to interpret radiological images but only if an attending radiologist also reviews the image and provides any necessary input to the interpretive report.

“In fact, they had not reviewed those images,” Tammy Dickinson, U.S. attorney for the Western District, said in a statement.

A federal investigation starting in 2011 led to an internal investigation by the university that revealed that two attending radiologists, Dr. Kenneth Rall and Dr. Michael Richards, violated Medicare and hospital rules when they certified certain interpretive reports prepared by resident physicians.

Rall and Richards left the employment of the university in June 2012 when their actions were uncovered.

"We were shocked and disappointed to learn about this," Hal Williamson, vice chancellor of the MU Health System, told the Columbia Tribune at the time. "This is inconsistent with our values," he said, adding that "we believe these two doctors sometimes claimed that they had actually completed this second review without actually looking at the image."

The health system claimed that patient health was not compromised by the actions – despite the widespread practice by the pair. The Tribune “obtained records that indicated that 62.5 percent of Medicare cases from the department did not have proper physician orders.”

Rall, chairman of radiology, earned a $571,200 salary from the university. Richards pulled in $245,742, according to the paper. And that doesn't included pay from patients, insurers or others.

The paper's archives also revealed that Rall had faced embezzling charges in 1986, when partners discovered that he was benefiting from the time lag of fund transfers between banks, as well as writing checks to patients marked as Medicaid refunds, to which they weren't entitled. Then he would sign the checks over to himself. He testified at the time that he returned $928,000, according to the Tribune

Rall escaped potential felony charges in that case when the prosecutor lost documents before trial, according to the paper.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

U.S. Healthcare Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment